Russell v. State

Feb 17, 1999
98-2515
Reporters:
,
Before:
Jorgenson, Goderich, Sorondo (per curiam)

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant‘s sentences as a violent career criminal, Higgs v. State, 695 So.2d 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), and again certify conflict with the Second District‘s opinion in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 717 So.2d 538 (Fla.1998).

Affirmed; conflict certified.