Russell v. SelskyRussell v. Selsky
- Reporters:
- ,
The detailed misbehavior report provides substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Loper v Greene, 19 AD3d 947, 948 [2005]; Matter of Burr v Goord, 284 AD2d 881, 882 [2001]). Petitioner‘s claim that the report was written in retaliation for his filing a grievance against a correction officer presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Loper v Greene, supra at 948; Matter of Shell v Superintendent of Oneida Correctional Facility, 18 AD3d 1044, 1044 [2005]). Moreover, we find no merit to petitioner‘s claim that he was improperly denied the right to have two inmates testify at the hearing inasmuch as the record discloses that these inmates executed refusal forms setting forth the reasons they did not wish to testify (see Matter of Fletcher v Goord, 16 AD3d 731, 733 [2005]; Matter of Nimmons v Goord, 7 AD3d 887, 888 [2004]). Accordingly, we decline to disturb the determination.
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.