History
  • No items yet
midpage
Russell v. Russell
200 U.S. 613
SCOTUS
1906
Check Treatment

Appeal from the United States Circuit Court *614of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted January 8, 1906. Decided January 15, 1906. Mr. John H. Hazelton and Mr. John G. Carlisle for appellant. Mr. Walter H. Bacon and Mr. Robert H. McCarter for ap-pellees. Per. Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Colorado Central Mining Company v. Turck, 150 U. S. 138; Press Publishing Company v. Monroe, 164 U. S. 105; Ex parte Jones, 164 U. S. 691; Continental National Bank v. Buford, 191 U. S. 119; Spencer v. Duplan Silk Company, 191 U. S. 526.

Case Details

Case Name: Russell v. Russell
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 15, 1906
Citation: 200 U.S. 613
Docket Number: No. 307
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.