History
  • No items yet
midpage
Russell v. Deadwood Development Co.
94 N.W. 693
S.D.
1903
Check Treatment
Puller, J.

Although this case was placed upon the April, 1902, calendar, and assigned for argument at that term, no abstracts or briefs have ever been filed. According to the settled practice of this court, it is presumed that there are no questions upon which a decision is desired. Benedict v. Smith 10 S. D. 35, 71 N. W. 139; Giles et al. v. Hawkeye Gold Mining Co. et al., 11 S. D. 222, 76 N. W. 928. In the absence of anything within our reach pertaining to the merits, the appeal is dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Russell v. Deadwood Development Co.
Court Name: South Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: May 8, 1903
Citation: 94 N.W. 693
Court Abbreviation: S.D.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.