midpage

Russell v. CollinsRussell v. Collins

Supreme Court of the United States
Jun 28, 1991
No. 89-7679; No. 90-5512; No. 90-5726; No. 90-6029; No. 90-6758; No. 90-6819; No. 90-6939; No. 90-7018; No. 90-7067; No. 90-7449; No. 90-7499; No. 90-7557; No. 90-7560; No. 90-7570; No. 90-7756; No. 90-7830; No. 90-7871; No. 90-7905; No. 90-7916; No. 90-7973; No. 90-8023; No. 90-8093
Versions:501 U.S. 1259

Lead Opinion

C. A. 5th Cir.; Sup. Ct. Fla.; Sup. Ct. Mont.; Sup. Ct. Fla.; Super. Ct. Ariz., Pima County; Sup. Ct. Ind.; Sup. Ct. Idaho; Super. Ct. Ariz., Pima County; Sup. Ct. Mo.; Sup. Ct. Fla.; Sup. Ct. Ind.; Ct. Crim. App. Tex.; Ct. Crim. App. Tex.; Ct. Crim. App. Tex.; Sup. Ct. S. C.; Sup. Ct. Ga.; Ct. Crim. App. Okla.; Sup. Ct. Mo.; Ct. Crim. App. Tex.; Sup. Ct. Fla.; Ct. Crim. App. Tex.; and Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.

denied.






Dissenting Opinion

Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 231 (1976), I would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.

Case Details

Case Name: Russell v. Collins
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jun 28, 1991
Citations: 501 U.S. 1259; No. 89-7679; No. 90-5512; No. 90-5726; No. 90-6029; No. 90-6758; No. 90-6819; No. 90-6939; No. 90-7018; No. 90-7067; No. 90-7449; No. 90-7499; No. 90-7557; No. 90-7560; No. 90-7570; No. 90-7756; No. 90-7830; No. 90-7871; No. 90-7905; No. 90-7916; No. 90-7973; No. 90-8023; No. 90-8093
Docket Number: No. 89-7679; No. 90-5512; No. 90-5726; No. 90-6029; No. 90-6758; No. 90-6819; No. 90-6939; No. 90-7018; No. 90-7067; No. 90-7449; No. 90-7499; No. 90-7557; No. 90-7560; No. 90-7570; No. 90-7756; No. 90-7830; No. 90-7871; No. 90-7905; No. 90-7916; No. 90-7973; No. 90-8023; No. 90-8093
Court Abbreviation: U.S.
Log In