History
  • No items yet
midpage
Russell v. . Campbell
112 N.C. 404
N.C.
1893
Check Treatment

* MacRAE, J., did not sit on the hearing of this case. Upon the call of the case in this Court it appeared from statement of counsel that the matter had been settled, "and that no rights of parties would be affected by the determination of this case, and that the only matter involved is the costs of the action."

Plaintiff's counsel moved to dismiss. This was an appeal from the refusal of a judgment for the restitution of certain personal property. Since the appeal was taken, the appellant has come into possession of the property, or its equivalent. The Court will not hear a matter merely to adjudicate the costs when the subject-matter of the appeal has been disposed of. S. v. (405)R. R., 74 N.C. 287; Hasty v. Funderburk, 89 N.C. 93; Pritchardv. Baxter, 108 N.C. 129.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Cited: Elliott v. Tyson, 117 N.C. 115; Herring v. Pugh, 125 N.C. 438;Van Dyke v. Ins. Co., 174 N.C. 81. *Page 312

Case Details

Case Name: Russell v. . Campbell
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Feb 5, 1893
Citation: 112 N.C. 404
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.