Rushmore v. Rushmore, 176 A. 142

Pee Cueiam.

We concur in the conclusion of the advisory master that the evidence establishes an abandonment of respondent by appellant under circumstances entitling her to separate maintenance. The allegation, made by appellant, that respondent has been guilty of a willful, continued and obstinate desertion, is not sustained by the proofs.

The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Deae, Wells, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Rushmore v. Rushmore

Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date Published: Jan 10, 1935

Citations: 176 A. 142; 117 N.J. Eq. 451; 1935 N.J. LEXIS 667

Court Abbreviation: N.J.