History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rushmore v. Miller
4 Edw. Ch. 84
New York Court of Chancery
1843
Check Treatment

The Vice-Chancellor, decided that a surety, in such a case as the above, could not claim notice or a demand; and might be introduced as a defendant to fix him for any deficiency, without it.(b)

Although the late case of Gillett v. Balcom, 6 Barb. S. C. Rep. 370 has reference to a mortgage made on demand, yet it may be well to refer the reader to it.

Case Details

Case Name: Rushmore v. Miller
Court Name: New York Court of Chancery
Date Published: Jul 6, 1843
Citation: 4 Edw. Ch. 84
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.