midpage

Ruiz v. PeraltaRuiz v. Peralta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jun 19, 2003
Versions:306 A.D.2d 150
760 N.Y.S.2d 324
2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7199

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alexander Hunter, J.), entered March 4, 2003, which, in an action for personal injuries allegedly caused by a malfunctioning traffic light that defendant-appellant was under contract with defendant City of New York to maintain, insofar as appealed from, denied appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and the City’s cross claim as against it, with leave to renew upon completion of disclosure, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The evidence of multiple repairs on the subject traffic light performed by appellant in the eight months before the accident warrants denial of its motion for summary judgment without prejudice to renewal upon completion of disclosure (CPLR 3212 [f]; Ludwig v Welsbach Elec. Corp., 305 AD2d 124 [2003]). Concur — Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Williams and Marlow, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Ruiz v. Peralta
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 19, 2003
Citations: 306 A.D.2d 150; 760 N.Y.S.2d 324; 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7199
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In