History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ruggles v. Patten
8 Mass. 480
Mass.
1812
Check Treatment
By the Court.

This is an action of assumpsit brought by the endorsee against one of several joint promisers in a negotiable note for the payment of money. The defendant pleads in bar, that one of the joint promisers, other than himself, had paid his share or proportion of the money promised to the promisee, before the note was assigned, and that, in consideration thereof, the promisee had acquitted all the promisers from any further demand on * the note. As the promise appears from the record to have been joint, if the defendant would avail himself of that fact, he snould have shown it as matter in abatement. A payment of part by one promiser cannot operate a discharge of the rest.

In a fourth plea the defendant says that the holder of the note was not present at the time and place appointed for payment But this is no bar to an action on a promise to pay money ; and the *402issue tendered was therefore an immaterial one. The pleas in bar are insufficient; and let judgment be entered on the verdict.

Case Details

Case Name: Ruggles v. Patten
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Mar 15, 1812
Citation: 8 Mass. 480
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.