History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rufus Anderson v. Greenville Health System
687 F. App'x 281
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rufus J. C. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. David Lee Harris, Jr., Michael Montgomery Shetterly, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rufus Julius Cornelius Anderson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Anderson’s motion for an order of protection or restraining order, deny his motion for a subpoena, grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Greenville Health Sys. , No. 6:16-cv-01051-MGL (D.S.C. Oct. 31, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Rufus Anderson v. Greenville Health System
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 28, 2017
Citation: 687 F. App'x 281
Docket Number: 17-1062
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.