History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ruffin v. . Garrett
174 N.C. 134
N.C.
1917
Check Treatment

Demurrer to the complaint was made ore tenus upon the ground that no cause of action is stated, and was sustained and action dismissed. Plaintiff appealed. The complaint alleges that defendants are supervisors of the public roads in Ahoskie Township, Hertford County; that it was their duty to keep in proper repair and in a reasonably safe condition the roads and bridges of said township; that defendants negligently failed to do so; that in consequence of such negligence plaintiff's automobile was badly damaged in crossing an unsafe bridge in bad condition.

The ground of the demurrer is that the complaint fails to allege that the negligence of defendants was either corrupt or malicious. The demurrer was properly sustained.

This subject is fully discussed and the authorities reviewed by Justice Hoke in the recent case of Hipp v. Ferrall, 91 S.E. 831, and further discussion is unnecessary.

Affirmed.

Cited: Spruill v. Davenport, 178 N.C. 366; Wilkins v. Burton,220 N.C. 15. *Page 146

(135)

Case Details

Case Name: Ruffin v. . Garrett
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Sep 26, 1917
Citation: 174 N.C. 134
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.