History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rudiger v. Coleman
114 N.Y.S. 689
N.Y. App. Div.
1908
Check Treatment
Gaynor, J.;

The learned counsel for the appellants has submitted to us a large volume of 361 pages which is called a brief. It is not a brief, and does not servé the purpose of elucidating and aiding which is done by a brief. It has in addition an index of 12 pages, which is about the length the brief would have been if made after the way established for the making of briefs. The case is a simple one, was tried with care and true discernment by the learned trial Judge, and as the opinion he filed leaves nothing additional to be said on the law or the facts, the judgment should be affirmed thereon.* Jenks and Miller, JJ., concurred; Woodward and Hooker, JJ., concurred in result. Julgment affirmed, with costs.

For opinion see N. Y. Sup. Ct. Cases & Briefs of Counsel (State Law Library), Vol. 7138, No. 1, p. 746 et seq.— [Rep.

Case Details

Case Name: Rudiger v. Coleman
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 15, 1908
Citation: 114 N.Y.S. 689
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.