History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rudiger v. . Coleman
122 N.E. 877
NY
1919
Check Treatment

We think that the judgment entered upon the report of the referee as modified and affirmed by the Appellate Division is appealable to this court and, therefore, the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied. *Page 663 This determination, however, should not be regarded as indicating that we think that the appellants can bring up for review on said appeal all of the intermediate orders specified in their notice. Apparently such notice indicates an intent to ask this court to review practically all of the proceedings which have ever been taken in this long litigation, and it is perfectly manifest that some of the orders are discretionary while others cannot be regarded as necessarily affecting the final judgment now before us for review, and, therefore, they cannot be considered on this appeal.

The motion should be denied, without costs.

All concur.

Motion denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Rudiger v. . Coleman
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 14, 1919
Citation: 122 N.E. 877
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.