History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ruch v. Jones
33 Mo. 393
Mo.
1863
Check Treatment
Dryden, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The case hardly presents the point the parties wish decid*394ed, which is, whether the joint answer of several co-defendants is not sufficiently verified by the affidavit of one of them. We have no hesitation in answering the question in the affirmative. (Huntington & wife v. House, 22 Mo. 365.)

If the verification had been insufficient, still it was wrong to render judgment by default so long as the answer was on the record. The right practice in such case is to move to strike out the imperfectly verified answer, and after it is thus disposed of, then take the default; but as long as the answer stands, no matter whether imperfectly verified or not verified at all, it is error to enter a default. The affidavit is no part of the answer.

Let the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded.

The other judges concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Ruch v. Jones
Court Name: Supreme Court of Missouri
Date Published: Mar 15, 1863
Citation: 33 Mo. 393
Court Abbreviation: Mo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.