History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rubenstein v. Arbeitman
265 A.D. 893
N.Y. App. Div.
1942
Check Treatment

The action was for breach of warranty and fraud in the making of a lease. The plaintiff showed without contradiction that the defendant leased to the plaintiff a boarding house in the county of Sullivan and in inducing the making of the lease represented that the water, sewage and plumbing systems were in good condition and that the premises included bathing privileges in the Mongaup river. These representations, the plaintiff’s reliance upon them and the amount of the damages were conceded. The defendant denied their falsity and her knowledge of the same. The evidence showed, however, that defendant knew that another person owned the land along the river at the point in question and that she had no rights therein. It was also shown that she knew that the water and sewage systems were not in good condition. Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Poster, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Rubenstein v. Arbeitman
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 11, 1942
Citation: 265 A.D. 893
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.