History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rozewicz v. Ciminelli
116 A.D.2d 990
N.Y. App. Div.
1986
Check Treatment

— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs to plaintiff. Memorandum: In the absence of a timely motion made in accordance with CPLR 2214 and accompanied by a proposed pleading as required by CPLR 1014, it was error for Special Term even to entertain the request of New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company to intervene in this action (Matter of Colonial Sand & Stone Co. v Flacke, 75 AD2d 894, 895; Mohawk Maintenance Co. v Drake, 29 AD2d 689; Matter of Carriage Hill v Lane, 20 AD2d 914; cf. Ryder v Travelers Ins. Co., 37 AD2d 797; Sterling Natl. Bank & Trust Co. v Ambassador Factors Corp., 86 AD2d 547, 548; see, Siegel, NY Prac § 183, at 222-223). Although we affirm, we address no other issue. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Denman, Boomer, Green and O’Donnell, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Rozewicz v. Ciminelli
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 24, 1986
Citation: 116 A.D.2d 990
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.