History
  • No items yet
midpage
Royce v. Ziegfeld
222 A.D. 694
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1927
|
Check Treatment

Order modified so as to provide that paragraphs 6, 7, 8, 9,10,11,12,13,14,15,18 and 19 of the complaint be stricken out as irrelevant. As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. Young, Kapper and Carswell, JJ., concur; Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm without modification.

Case Details

Case Name: Royce v. Ziegfeld
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 15, 1927
Citation: 222 A.D. 694
Docket Number: Appeal No. 1
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.