245 F. 346 | 8th Cir. | 1917
From a recovery on an indemnity bond securing to' Beiseker payment of three certificates of deposit issued to him by the First International Bank of South Bend, Wash., the company sues its writ of error.
But the existence or nonexistence of negligence is not decisive in this case. It is highly questionable whether negligence on the obligee’s part is any defense to an insurance contract, unless it be expressed or clearly implied in the terms of the bond. However this may be, negligence cannot be a defense, unless its absence would have prevented the loss. Here it is conceded that the bank was just as financially able to pay the draft July 9th as it would have been to pay the certificates upon June 11 th or 14th, or any intervening date. It is very clear that the bank had no intention of paying them at any of these times. It hoped
The judgment is affirmed.
— other cases see same toDic & KEY-NUMBER In all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes