History
  • No items yet
midpage
Royal Baking Co. v. Samergedes
170 So. 2d 842
Fla.
1964
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida *843Industrial Commission bearing date April 28, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ-, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Royal Baking Co. v. Samergedes
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Sep 9, 1964
Citation: 170 So. 2d 842
Docket Number: No. 33491
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.