History
  • No items yet
midpage
Roy Scott Realty Co. v. Hewitt
96 Fla. 765
| Fla. | 1928
|
Check Treatment

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein and briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be and the same is hereby affirmed. See Strickland v. Jewell, 80 Fla., 221, 85 So. R. 670; Lee v. Patton, 34 Fla., 149, 15 So. R. 775; Gentry-Futch Co., v. Gentry, 106 So. R. 473, 90 Fla., 595.

ELLIS, C. J., AND STRUM AND BROWN, J. J., concur. *Page 766

Case Details

Case Name: Roy Scott Realty Co. v. Hewitt
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Dec 10, 1928
Citation: 96 Fla. 765
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.