History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rowley v. Doe e. d. Carpenter
1 Smith & H. 335
Ind.
1849
Check Treatment
Smith, J.

— “ The Court below appears to have held upon the trial that the Enlargement was intended to correspond with the original plan of the city, as to the size of the blocks, notwithstanding the specification in the videlicet, that they are to be eighteen poles square. From an examination of both plats and the specifications accompanying them, we think it may be fairly inferred that such wap the intention of the proprietor, and as the Court below has so determined, we shall not disturb the judgment.”

Judgment affirmed, &c.

Case Details

Case Name: Rowley v. Doe e. d. Carpenter
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 15, 1849
Citation: 1 Smith & H. 335
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.