History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rowe-Linn v. Berman
601 So. 2d 618
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1992
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The petition is granted. Although we do not issue a writ of prohibition, we are confident respondent will promptly disqualify himself, and the circuit court will assign the case below to another judge.

While we do not think the motion for disqualification was legally sufficient, we fear the respondent stepped over the line in the order of denial by failing to “limit his inquiry to a determination of the sufficiency of the motion to disqualify,” and attempting “to justify denial of the motion for reasons other than ... legal sufficiency.” Fruehe v. Reasbeck, 525 So.2d 471, 472 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). See also cases cited therein.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and GUNTHER, J., concur. WARNER, J., dissents without opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: Rowe-Linn v. Berman
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jun 24, 1992
Citation: 601 So. 2d 618
Docket Number: No. 92-1396
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.