History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rouster v. State
600 N.E.2d 1342
Ind.
1992
Check Treatment

Steven W. PIRNAT, Appellant (Defendant Below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff Below)

No. 82S01-9210-CR-837

Supreme Court of Indiana

Oct. 16, 1992

ability of a small child. To me, the abrogation of this rule is an erosion, albeit small, of the protection of children. I would not diminish that protection one iota.

I concur with the majority in their affirmance of the conviction of appellant.

David M. Shaw, Evansville, for appellant.

Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., Sue A. Bradley, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee.

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

A jury found Steven W. Pirnat guilty of child molesting, a class D felony, Ind.Code Ann. § 35-42-4-3(d) (West 1986). The Court of Appeals affirmed.

Pirnat v. State (1992), Ind. App., 596 N.E.2d 259.

Pirnat‘s petition for transfer alleges error in the introduction of certain evidence admitted to show his depraved sexual instinct. We have today in

Lannan v. State, 600 N.E.2d 1334 (1992), revisited the depraved sexual instinct exception and announced a new rule concerning the admissibility of prior bad acts in sex offense cases. Inasmuch as Pirnat‘s appeal is currently pending as this new rule is announced, the rule of Lannan should be applied to his case.
Daniels v. State (1990), Ind., 561 N.E.2d 487, 488
. See, also,
Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 107 S.Ct. 708, 93 L.Ed.2d 649 (1987)
;
Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 109 S.Ct. 1060, 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989)
.

Therefore we remand to the Court of Appeals for reexamination of Pirnat‘s appeal in light of our holding today in

Lannan v. State.

DeBRULER, DICKSON and KRAHULIK, JJ., concur.

GIVAN, J., votes to deny transfer.

Case Details

Case Name: Rouster v. State
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 16, 1992
Citation: 600 N.E.2d 1342
Docket Number: 45S00-8710-CR-914
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.