History
  • No items yet
midpage
Roush v. Van Hagen
18 Cal. 668
Cal.
1861
Check Treatment
Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Cope, J. concurring.

The appeal must be dismissed. The true construction is that the sureties must justify before a County Judge—when that is the officer selected—of the county in which the suit is. Any other construction, if. it did not render the main provisions of the statute practically inoperative, would lead to very onerous and embarrassing results. We think the natural construction of the language of the three hundred and fifty-fifth section of the Practice Act leads to this conclusion.

Ordered accordingly.

Case Details

Case Name: Roush v. Van Hagen
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1861
Citation: 18 Cal. 668
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.