102 Ga. 109 | Ga. | 1897
The official report states the facts.
Nor was there any error in allowing a further amendment substituting the name of J. C. Simonds in the suit as plaintiff suing for the use of the bank. Civil Code, § 5105. The first amendment was sufficient to authorize the plaintiff to proceed with the suit in its own name, and the latter amendment, though lawful and proper, was unnecessary, and was therefore harmless.
There was no error committed by the judge of the court below, and the final judgment was correct.
Judgment affirmed.