History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rountree v. Neely
147 Ga. 435
| Ga. | 1917
|
Check Treatment
Hill, J.

1. The grounds of the motion for a new trial which except to the failure of the court to give certain specific instructions to the jury are without merit. The general charge covered the issues in the ease, though in some respects but meagerly; and if more specific instructions were desired upon certain issues, a timely request therefor, should have been made. '

2. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict, and the court -did . not err in denying the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Gilbert, J., disqualified.

Case Details

Case Name: Rountree v. Neely
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Dec 13, 1917
Citation: 147 Ga. 435
Docket Number: No. 160
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.