History
  • No items yet
midpage
Roundtree v. State
786 So. 2d 679
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2001
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Finding no error in the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal, we affirm the conviction for burglary and theft. See Miller v. State, 403 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Piantadosi v. State, 311 So.2d 742 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

However, as correctly conceded by the State, the trial court erred in sentencing the defendant as a prison releasee reoffen-der to 15 years mandatory minimum imprisonment for burglary of an unoccupied dwelling. See State v. Huggins, 26 Fla. L. Weekly S174, — So.2d —, 2001 WL 278107 (Fla. March 22, 2001); Rodriguez v. State, 773 So.2d 1222 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Accordingly, we reverse the defendant’s sentence and remand to the trial court for resentencing.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded for resentencing.

Case Details

Case Name: Roundtree v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jun 20, 2001
Citation: 786 So. 2d 679
Docket Number: No. 3D00-3627
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.