History
  • No items yet
midpage
Roughan v. . Chenango Valley Savings Bank
216 N.Y. 696
NY
1915
Check Treatment

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO and POUND, JJ. Dissenting: HISCOCK, CHASE and CUDDEBACK, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Roughan v. . Chenango Valley Savings Bank
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 16, 1915
Citation: 216 N.Y. 696
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.