History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ross v. State
308 S.E.2d 713
Ga. Ct. App.
1983
Check Treatment
Sognier, Judge.

Appellants were convicted of robbery by sudden snatching. Their attorney filed a motion to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief raising points of law which he considered could arguably support an appeal. We are in agreement with counsel that none of the points raised, though persuasively presented, has any merit. Therefore, we granted the motion to withdraw. In addition, we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if there are any meritorious errors of law. We have found none. We are satisfied that the evidence produced at trial was sufficient to authorize any rational trier of fact to find appellants guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes charged. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 (264 SE2d 528).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Ross v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 19, 1983
Citation: 308 S.E.2d 713
Docket Number: 66982
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.