History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ross v. McDonalds Corp (TV2)
1:20-cv-00361
E.D. Tenn.
Feb 26, 2021
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at CHATTANOOGA

JAMES EDWARD ROSS, )

)

Plaintiff , )

)

v. ) No. 1:20-cv-00361-TAV-SKL

)

MCDONALDS CORP., )

)

Defendant . )

REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

This case was filed pro se and without payment of filing fees by Plaintiff James Edward Ross (“Plaintiff”). Plaintiff initiated this case on December 30, 2020, by filing a complaint [Doc. 1] and a motion/application (“Application”) for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) [Doc. 2].

On January 6, 2021, the Court entered an Order outlining various deficiencies in Plaintiff’s complaint and requiring Plaintiff to file an amended complaint by no later than February 12, 2021. Plaintiff was specifically warned that any failure to file an amended complaint that states a claim would result in dismissal of this action [Doc. 7]. [1] Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint or otherwise communicated with the Court.

Accordingly, I RECOMMEND [2] that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT *2 PREJUDICE , that Plaintiff’s IFP Application [Doc. 2] be DENIED AS MOOT, and that this case be CLOSED .

ENTER:

s/ fâátÇ ^A _xx SUSAN K. LEE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Failure to file objections within the time specified waives the right to appeal the district court’s order. Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140, 149 n.7 (1985). The district court need not provide de novo review where objections to this report and recommendation are frivolous, conclusive and general. Mira v. Marshall , 806 F.2d 636, 637 (6th Cir. 1986). Only specific objections are reserved for appellate review. Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers , 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987).

2

Case 1:20-cv-00361-TAV-SKL Document 9 Filed 02/26/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID

#: 26

[1] On February 16, 2021, a docket notation [Doc. 8] was made that mail sent to Plaintiff on December 30, 2020 at the address listed for Plaintiff on the docket (i.e., general delivery since Plaintiff has no residence [Doc. 1 at Page ID # 1] was returned as undeliverable. The envelope has a notation dated February 13, 2021 by the U.S. Postal Service that the mail was unclaimed and unable to be forwarded.

[2] Any objections to this report and recommendation must be served and filed within fourteen (14) days after service of a copy of this recommended disposition on the objecting party. Such objections must conform to the requirements of Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Case 1:20-cv-00361-TAV-SKL Document 9 Filed 02/26/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 25

Case Details

Case Name: Ross v. McDonalds Corp (TV2)
Court Name: District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Date Published: Feb 26, 2021
Docket Number: 1:20-cv-00361
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Tenn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.