75 Ind. App. 182 | Ind. Ct. App. | 1920
Appellee recovered judgment for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by appellee while in the employ of appellant as railroad brakeman. The only question properly presented for consideration by this court, and not specifically waived by appellant at the time of the oral argument, are those presented by the alleged error of the trial court in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Error is predicated upon the action of the court in the giving of certain instructions. The court’s instructions, however, when taken as a whole, fairly state the law of the case.
The verdict is fully sustained by the evidence. Judgment affirmed.