| N.Y. App. Div. | Jan 10, 1908
This is a proceeding to substitute the Old Colony Corporation as plaintiff in this action to determine to whom the moneys to be collected upon certain judgments in favor of the .plaintiff should be paid. By an agreement executed on the 10th day of September, 1902, the plaintiff assigned, transferred and conveyed to the Old Colony Bealty Corporation all his right, title and interest in certain claims against the defendant and authorized the said corporation to continue such actions in the name of the plaintiff, the corporation agreeing to pay to the plaintiff all money recovered in said action or actions received by the Old Colony Bealty Corporation in excess of the sum of $2,230.65 and interest, .whether the same be fpr costs or for damages. The action was tried in October, 1904, and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for $2,433.04. The defendant appealed to this court where the judgment was affirmed (108 App. Div. 366), and subsequently, to the Court of Appeals with the like result. (186 N.Y. 612" court="NY" date_filed="1906-12-21" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/ross-v--bayer-gardner-himes-company-3613175?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3613175">186 N. Y. 612.) John Aitken was the attorney for the plaintiff in such action and remained the attorney of 'record down to the affirmance of the judgments by the Court of Appeals.
When the application came on to be heard at Special Term a referee was appointed to take the proof and ascertain the extent and the amount of the lien as existing in favor of John Aitken for services and disbursements respecting the original judgment rendered upon the verdict of a jury and the two judgments on appeal. The referee reported that the plaintiff was entitled to receive out of the proceeds of said judgments the costs and. disbursements as taxed and the sum of $150 expended by him for premiums on surety bonds subsequent to the assignment of the causes of action to the petitioner, the Old Colony Bealty Corporation, and that the Old Colony Bealty Corporation was entitled to receive the balance.
The plaintiff’s attorney filed exceptions to this report, and upon motion to confirm it the Special Term denied the motion, and
After the. affirmance of this judgment by the .Appellate Division, the plaintiff’s attorney rendered a bill to the Old Colony Corporation for $882.43, which he testified was the reasonable value of his services up to that time. I agree with the court below that the plaintiff’s attorney was entitled to the reasonable value of his services, but I think that the amount to be paid him should be limited to $882.43, the amount of his bill for services and disbursements up to'the time that this court affirmed the judgment, the costs in the Court of Appeals and $100 for his services in the Court of Appeals. The amount of the Costs as taxed in the Court of Appeals was $104.10. The plaintiff should be paid his bill of $882.43, $104.10 costs in the Court of Appeals and $100 for' his services in the Court of Appeals, making in all $1,086.53, the balance to be paid to. the Cid Cblony Realty Corporation-.
The order should be modified by directing th'e payment to the plaintiff’s attorney of $1,086.53, and as modified affirmed, without costs. ' . ■
Patterson, P. J., Laughlin, Clarice and Scott, JR, concurred.
Order modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Settle Order on notice.