History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rosinoff v. Altshul
99 N.J.L. 519
N.J.
1924
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, HEPPENHEIMER, GARDNER, ACKERSON, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Rosinoff v. Altshul
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jan 25, 1924
Citation: 99 N.J.L. 519
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.