Rosinoff v. Altshul
99 N.J.L. 519
| N.J. | 1924

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, HEPPENHEIMER, GARDNER, ACKERSON, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.