262 P. 395 | Cal. Ct. App. | 1927
Plaintiff sued for the conversion of two pumps and one cone tank seized by the defendant Taylor, as constable, under a writ of execution issuing out of the justice's court. Plaintiff had judgment against the defendant Taylor alone for the return of the two pumps or for their value fixed at $425 and for $100 damages for their conversion. From this judgment this defendant has appealed on a typewritten record.
The pumps were purchased by one Sam Kessler in April, 1925, dismantled and hauled by truck from Mountain View to the yard of Kessler located in Oakland. They were then sold by Kessler to plaintiff in their dismantled state some time in May of the same year. The purchaser took immediate possession and with the aid of two men employed by him gathered up the parts, which were scattered about Kessler's yard, reassembled the pumps and stored them in a shed at the rear of the yard for protection against the weather. Some of the valves belonging to the pumps were not assembled but were taken by the plaintiff to his own place of business and remained continuously in his possession.
It is the contention of the appellant that findings number 9 and 10 relating to the transfer of possession to and the continuous exercise of possession by the respondent are *401
not supported by the evidence. The appellant argues that the provisions of section
The rules of law involved are well settled. [1] What constitutes delivery and possession is a question of fact to be determined by the trial court in view of the circumstances of each particular case. (Dubois v. Spinks,
Judgment affirmed.
Sturtevant, J., and Koford, P.J., concurred. *402