History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rosenberg v. Wilson
154 Ga. 625
Ga.
1922
Check Treatment
Hill, J.

1. On conflicting evidence the trial judge did not abuse bis discretion in refusing a temporary injunction and in dissolving the order appointing a temporary receiver.

2. A final decree can not be entered in any case at an interlocutory hearing. Accordingly, so much of the interlocutory order as refused an interlocutory injunction and dissolved the- former order appointing a temporary receiver is affirmed; and so much of the order as decrees the payment of costs to the receiver and the issuing of execution therefor, being final, is reversed.

Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.

All the Justices concur. Colley & Colley, for plaintiff. C. E. Sutton, for defendants.

Case Details

Case Name: Rosenberg v. Wilson
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Dec 15, 1922
Citation: 154 Ga. 625
Docket Number: No. 3053
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.