Rosenberg v. Feigin

110 Cal. App. 2d 56 | Cal. Ct. App. | 1952

HANSON, J. pro tem.

The appeal is from an order denying a motion to set aside a ruling which sustained a to the third amended complaint. The order is not an appealable order (Code Civ. Proc., § 963; Title Ins. & Trust Co. v. California Dev. Co., 159 Cal. 484 [114 P. 838]).

The appeal is dismissed.

White, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Rosenberg v. Feigin

Court Name: California Court of Appeal

Date Published: Mar 26, 1952

Citation: 110 Cal. App. 2d 56

Docket Number: Civ. No. 18580

Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.