History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rosenbaum v. Schatia
248 A.D. 722
N.Y. App. Div.
1936
Check Treatment

Plaintiffs, claiming to have been coadventurers with defendant in the formation of a corporation and in the exploitation and commercialization of a certain device, sued to recover from defendant damages for his breach of the contract of eo adventure pursuant to which he was to have furnished to the corporation formed under said contract funds necessary for its financing from which were to be paid to plaintiffs certain salaries. Judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiffs, after trial at Trial Term affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Martin, P. J., and Cohn, J., dissent.

Case Details

Case Name: Rosenbaum v. Schatia
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 15, 1936
Citation: 248 A.D. 722
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.