History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rose v. Learned
14 Mass. 154
| Mass. | 1817
|
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The nonsuit must be set aside, and anew triar granted; because the nonsuit was ordered, not for the defect of evidence on the part of the plaintiff, but on evidence produced by the defendant, which might not have been believed by the jury.

Further, the facts contained in the deposition read at the trial would not avoid the note, unless proved by writing. The evidence that a written agreement to the same effect has been lost is not sufficient, (a)

New trial granted.

[See Lock vs. Wood, 16 Mass. Rep. 317, and note. — Mitchell vs. New E. M. Ins. Co. 12 Mass. Rep. 49, and note.— Bridge vs. Sumner, 1 Pick. 371.— Babcock vs Thomas, 3 Pick. 403. — Dewar vs. Purday, 4 Nev. & Man. 633. — 3 Al & . E. 166. — Tidd, P. Forms, 6th ed. 370, 371. — Ed.]

Case Details

Case Name: Rose v. Learned
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: May 15, 1817
Citation: 14 Mass. 154
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.