History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rose v. Keystone Shoe Co.
2 Sadler 243
Pa.
1886
Check Treatment
Per Curiam :

The learned judge ruled the law correctly. If the money was loaned to the partners individually, yet if it was put into the business by them as part of their capital, it constituted ■a valid consideration to support the judgment confessed by them. The good faith of the transaction was a question of fact for the jury, and was well submitted.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Rose v. Keystone Shoe Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 12, 1886
Citation: 2 Sadler 243
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.