30 A. 459 | R.I. | 1894
Lead Opinion
The court sees no occasion to pass upon the question whethermandamus may properly issue as prayed.
It appears from the affidavits filed that on the return of the jury into court, the foreman was asked by the clerk if they had agreed on a verdict; that thereupon a paper from the foreman was handed to the clerk which read as follows: "We, the jury, agree that the defendant alienated the affections of the plaintiff's wife from him, and we assess the damages at $1,000." This paper, however, was not read to the jury by the clerk, nor were they asked whether it was their verdict, nor was it signed by the jury or by the foreman. It does not appear, therefore, that it was assented to by the jury as its finding, and the jury having been subsequently discharged from further consideration of the case, there is no way now by which the assent of the jury can be obtained; and, therefore, it cannot be entered on the record as their verdict. The trial, having thus resulted, must be regarded as a mistrial, and, consequently, the case must stand for another trial.
Petition denied and dismissed.
A petition for a rehearing was then filed and the cause was re-argued.
Providence, March 17, 1894.
Addendum
Upon the re-argument of the matter decided in our former rescript we see no occasion to modify our decision, and as an additional reason for denying the petition we are of the opinion that the court cannot be required to receive a verdict until the special issues submitted to the jury in accordance with the *529 provisions of the Judiciary Act, cap. 23, § 7,1 have all been found.
SEC. 7. In any case, the common pleas division of the supreme court may, and upon request of either party shall, direct the jury to return a special verdict upon any issue submitted to the jury. Such issues shall be settled by the justice presiding at the trial, and either party may except to his rulings thereon. In addition to such special findings on the issues submitted, the jury shall in each case return a general verdict, and shall assess such damages, if any, therein as they may deem just. The appellate division of the supreme court may, on motion of any party made and filed, together with a statement of the evidence in such cause at said trial in manner as is elsewhere provided in cases of petitions for new trial, set aside any general verdict and order judgment to be entered by the common pleas division in favor of either party upon any special verdict found in any cause; or it may order a new trial generally, or upon any issue submitted at such trial, as upon inspection of all the evidence adduced, and the general and special verdicts found therein, to it shall seem just.
