History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rosales v. Moya
198 U.S. 581
SCOTUS
1905
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Royal Insurance Company v. Martin, 192 *582U. S. 149; Railroad Company v. Hopkins, 130 U. S. 210; Filhis v. Maurice, 185 U. S. 108; Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Louisville, 166 U. S. 709; Harrison v. Morton, 171 U. S. 38.

Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, Mr. Wayne MacVeagh and Mr. J. S. Flannery for plaintiff in error. Mr. George H. Lamar for defendants in error.

Case Details

Case Name: Rosales v. Moya
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: May 29, 1905
Citation: 198 U.S. 581
Docket Number: No. 431
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.