History
  • No items yet
midpage
Roper v. Woolford
126 Pa. 47
Pa.
1889
Check Treatment
Pee, Cueiam:

The learned court below affirmed the report of the master without filing an opinion. We do the same. It is so clear and satisfactory that it would be a work of supererogation to add anything to what he has so well said. His findings of facts are warranted by the evidence and his conclusions of law are correct.

The decree is affirmed and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellants.

Case Details

Case Name: Roper v. Woolford
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 29, 1889
Citation: 126 Pa. 47
Docket Number: No. 262
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.