143 Ga. 128 | Ga. | 1915
1. The overruling of a ground of a motion for a new trial which complains that certain interrogatories were not executed by the two commissioners agreed upon, but which failed to show that written notice of the exception to their execution had been given as required by
2. “Admissions of one of the parties to the suit, given in evidence by the other, need not be referred to specially in charging the jury, where no request to do so is made by either party.” Hawkins v. Kermode, 85 Ga. 116 (11 S. E. 560).
3. There was no merit in any of the other grounds of the motion for a new trial. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and there was no error in overruling the motion for new trial.
Judgment affirmed.