History
  • No items yet
midpage
Root v. Sherwood
6 Johns. 68
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1810
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The jury, when they came to the bar to deliver in their verdict, had a right to dissent from the verdict to which they had previously agreed. There js no verdict of any force but a public verdict, given openly in court; until it was received and recorded it was no verdict, and the jury had a right to alter it as they may a private verdict. The previous agreement, that the jury might seal up their verdict, did not take away from the parties, the right to a public verdict, duly delivered. There being then no legal verdict in this case, a new trial must be awarded with costs to abide the event of the suit.

New trial granted. -

Case Details

Case Name: Root v. Sherwood
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1810
Citation: 6 Johns. 68
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.