History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ronnie M. Keith v. S.R. Witowski, State of South Carolina Attorney General of South Carolina
929 F.2d 693
4th Cir.
1991
Check Treatment

929 F.2d 693
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronnie M. KEITH,
v.
S.R. WITOWSKI, State of South Carolina; Attorney General of
South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 91-6273.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 4, 1991.
Decided March 25, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. C. Weston Houck, District Judge. (CA-89-2949-K)

Ronnie M. Keith, appellant pro se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, S.C., for appellees.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Ronnie M. Keith seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Keith v. Witowski, CA-89-2949-K (D.S.C. Jan. 4, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Case Details

Case Name: Ronnie M. Keith v. S.R. Witowski, State of South Carolina Attorney General of South Carolina
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 25, 1991
Citation: 929 F.2d 693
Docket Number: 91-6273
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.