Case Information
*1 Affirmed and Opinion Filed February 25, 2015
In The No. 05-13-01052-CR RONALD TERRELL FLOYD, Appellant V.
On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12-11185-M MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Brown Opinion by Justice Bridges
Ronald Terrell Floyd pleaded guilty before a jury to felony driving while intoxicated.
See T P ENAL C ODE NN . §§ 49.04(a), 49.09(b)(2) (West Supp. 2014). After finding appellant guilty, the jury assessed punishment at five years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro *2 se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Do Not Publish
T R. PP . P. 47
131052F.U05
/David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE *3 JUDGMENT RONALD TERRELL FLOYD, Appellant Appeal from the 194th Judicial District
Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
No. 05-13-01052-CR V. F12-11185-M).
Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, Justices Fillmore and Brown participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED . Judgment entered February 25, 2015.
