History
  • No items yet
midpage
Romeo v. Romeo
331 N.Y.S.2d 870
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1972
|
Check Treatment

In a matrimonial action, plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 14, 1971, which denied his motion to vacate a decree of separation, to reinstate his action for annulment, and to modify support provisions. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The judgment of separation is res judicata as to the validity of the marriage *560(Statter v. Statter, 2 N Y 2d 668; Psaroudis v. Psaroudis, 27 N Y 2d 527). As plaintiff’s allegations do not fall into the category of newly discovered evidence, it would have been improper to reopen issues inherently decided in the action two years before (Matter of Wareham v. Wareham, 34 A D 2d 647). Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Martuseello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Romeo v. Romeo
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 10, 1972
Citation: 331 N.Y.S.2d 870
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.