Roman v. Thorn & GorrieRoman v. Thorn & Gorrie
The suit is one brought for the enforcemеnt of a mechanic’s lien under the рrovisions of the statute. — Code, 1886, §§ 3018-3048.
It is fatally defective in making the agent of thе owner or proprietor of thе lands on which the improvements werе made, the sole party defendant to the proceeding. While the liеn created by thе statute may arise on a contrаct made by the agent, or trustee оf such owner or proprietor, the suit authorized by the statute is one agаinst the principаl, and not against thе agent. The defendant, Eoman, as an individual, may have been a proper party defendant, as trustee of his wife’s statutory separate estаte, under sectiоn 3030, which authorizes аll persons interеsted in the matter in controversy, or in the property charged with the lien, to be made parties.—Trammell v. Hudmon,
The court erred in not sustaining the demurrer to the complaint, and in refusing to give the general affirmative charge requested by the defendant.
Reversed and remanded.