History
  • No items yet
midpage
Roller v. Maxwell
3 Blatchf. 142
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1853
Check Treatment
THE COURT

held:

1. That the official appraisal, not appealed from, was conclusive as to the dutiable value of the goods, when the protest did not point out any violation of law in making the ap-praisement;

2. That the protest, in this instance, did not embrace the question as to the value of the currency in which the invoice was made out; that it related exclusively to the foreign market value; and that that was determined by the report of the appraisers. Tariff Act Aug. 30, 1842, § 17 (5 Stat. 564); Act March 3, 1851, § 2 (9 Stat. 630).

Judgment for defendant.

Case Details

Case Name: Roller v. Maxwell
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Date Published: Dec 15, 1853
Citation: 3 Blatchf. 142
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.